Skip to content
REELFREE NATION
Research library

Short‐Form Video Media Use Is Associated With Greater Inattentive Symptoms in Thai School‐Age Children: Insights From a Cross‐Sectional Survey

In simple words

This survey in Thailand looked at whether short-form video use was linked with inattentive behaviour in children aged 6-12. Higher short-form video use was associated with higher inattentive behaviours, and this association was stronger in younger children. It did not find significant associations with hyperactive-impulsive or oppositional-defiant behaviours.

What the research says

In a cross-sectional survey of 528 participants in Thailand, short-form video media use was significantly associated with higher inattentive behaviors in children aged 6-12 after adjustment for covariates including total screen time, demographic data, parenting practices, and parental mental wellbeing. The association showed a significant negative interaction with age, indicating a stronger association among younger participants. No significant associations were found between short-form video media use and hyperactive-impulsive or oppositional-defiant behaviors, although total screen time remained significantly associated with these secondary outcomes.

What it does not establish

Cross-sectional survey design, so the study cannot establish causation or direction of effects. Outcomes were based on parent-rated SNAP-IV reports, which may be subject to reporting bias. The sample was drawn from outpatient vaccinations and child psychiatric clinics at a single tertiary hospital, which may limit generalizability. (Inferred from the study design; check the full paper.)

Why it matters to us

This study is relevant because it separates short-form video use from total screen time and links it specifically with inattentive symptoms in school-age children. It cannot show whether short-form video use leads to inattention, whether more inattentive children are drawn to this media, or how platform features such as algorithmic feeds may be involved.

This is REELFREE NATION’s interpretation, not a finding of the study.